Run a usability study
before your next standup.
Real participants test your product while an AI moderator asks the follow-up questions you would. No scheduling. No notetaking. Describe what you want to learn β Candor handles recruitment, moderation, and transcription. You get insights, not logistics.
Every evaluation on Candor is completed by a real person. Not an LLM. Not a synthetic label. Human judgment.
You spend more time on ops than on research
Recruiting takes longer than the research
You spend days finding participants, screening them, scheduling sessions, sending reminders, handling no-shows. By the time you run the study the sprint has moved on.
Moderation is a bottleneck
You can only run as many sessions as you have moderators and hours in the day. Five sessions takes a full week when you account for scheduling, running, and debriefing. And your best moderator is also your busiest person.
Insight delivery is always late
By the time you've transcribed, coded, synthesized, and presented findings, the team has already shipped. Research becomes a retrospective exercise instead of a decision-making input.
Research workflows, not research theater
AI-moderated usability test
Real participants browse your product while an AI voice moderator asks questions, probes on friction points, and adapts follow-ups in real time. You write the interview guide β topics to cover, areas to probe β and the AI runs the session. Every session is transcribed with key moments annotated. Run 5 sessions overnight instead of across a week.
Learn more about Voice Interviews βPreference testing on design variants
You have 3 design directions and need to know which one users prefer. Run pairwise comparisons with real users β they see two options side by side, pick a winner, and explain why. Get a ranked result with agreement metrics in hours, not days. Works for mockups, copy variants, icon options, anything visual or textual.
βWhich of these two onboarding screens feels easier to get started with?β
Concept validation with open-ended feedback
Show real participants a prototype, landing page, or concept description and collect open-ended reactions. Free text responses with optional follow-up from the AI moderator if you want richer signal. Use it to validate a direction before investing engineering time.
βAfter looking at this page, what do you think this product does? What's clear and what's confusing?β
What changes when you drop the overhead
Setup time
Traditional tools require project creation, screener surveys, panel selection, and scheduling windows. Candor: one command, participants recruited automatically via Prolific. Your study is live in minutes, not days.
Moderation
Traditional moderated research requires a live human moderator for every session. Candor's AI moderator runs sessions in parallel, 24/7, and never forgets to ask the follow-up question.
Time to insight
The traditional pipeline is sessions, transcription, coding, synthesis, report, presentation. Candor delivers transcripts with themes surfaced automatically. Your job starts at synthesis, not transcription.
A note on research rigor
We know UX researchers care deeply about methodology β so do we. Candor uses randomized presentation order to prevent position bias, counterbalanced pairwise comparisons, and attention checks to filter disengaged participants. Every study includes inter-rater agreement metrics so you can assess consensus at a glance. This isn't a survey tool with a nice UI β it's a research platform with proper methodology baked in.
Your next research round starts here
Your next research round can start in 5 minutes.